Best Residential Proxy in 2026, Decided by Live Data

The best residential proxy in our continuous benchmark right now is Maskify with a composite score of 90/100, measured by automated probes every 15 minutes across session reliability, success rate, latency and hard-target reachability. That answer can change as the data changes, and that is the point: “best” is a measurement, not a marketing claim. This page gives you the live comparison and a decision framework, so you can pick for your workload instead of trusting a static top-10 list.

Key takeaways

  • Rankings below come from live probes, recomputed daily over a 30-day window. No sponsored placements, no affiliate-driven ordering.
  • The cheapest provider we test ($0.30/GB) currently scores highest. Price does not predict quality in this market.
  • Sticky session survival ranges from 97.5% to 72.2% across providers. For login flows this single metric outweighs raw speed.
  • Match the metric to your use case: stateless scraping cares about success rate and latency; anything behind a login cares about session reliability.

Live comparison: residential proxy providers we test

Every provider below runs through the identical probe schedule from EU and US vantage points. The composite score weights core network performance (35%), session reliability (30%), neutral reachability (15%) and high-defense target reachability (20%); the full formula and its changelog live on the methodology page.

#ProviderComposite scoreSuccess rate (30d)Median latencyPrice
1Maskify89.593.6%637ms$0.3/GB
2Aceproxies79.382.9%579ms$6/GB
3GonzoProxy67.078.7%583ms$6.5/GB

Data renders fresh from the benchmark on every page view. Charts, score history and per-dimension breakdowns are on the live dashboard.

What “best” actually means: five criteria

Most “best residential proxy” lists rank on pool size and price because those numbers are easy to copy from a pricing page. The criteria that predict whether your job succeeds need measurement:

  1. Session reliability. Does a sticky session keep the same exit IP from first request to last? Across our providers, survival runs from 97.5% to 72.2%, and unexpected mid-session rotation from 1.4% to 7.3%. For logins, carts and checkouts this is the number to compare first.
  2. Success rate. The share of requests that complete, measured per plane: controlled endpoints, neutral targets and high-defense targets. A provider can ace easy targets and fold against bot protection, so we score them separately.
  3. Latency. Median time to first byte through the proxy. We publish p50 and p95 from each vantage point; a fast median with a bad p95 still breaks time-sensitive scraping.
  4. Geo accuracy. When you request a country, does the exit IP land there? We removed this dimension from the composite until our multi-country measurement meets our own bar, which is documented in the methodology changelog. Honest gaps beat fake precision.
  5. Cost per usable gigabyte. Sticker price divided by the share of traffic that actually does useful work. A cheap provider that breaks one session in four is more expensive than it looks; the current leaderboard shows the inverse can hold too.

Decision framework: pick by use case, not by rank

The headline ranking answers “who is best overall.” Your workload has its own weights. Start from the use case and follow the ranked page for it:

Use caseWhat dominates the pickRanked page
Google SERP analysisSuccess rate vs hard targetsSee ranking →
Amazon & e-commerceTarget reachability + sessionsSee ranking →
Social media managementSession reliability firstSee ranking →
Travel price aggregationLatency + success rateSee ranking →
Real estate dataSuccess rate + IP uniquenessSee ranking →
Web crawling at scaleThroughput + cost per GBSee ranking →

The providers, in current order

1. Maskify

Maskify holds first place with a composite score of 90/100 over the rolling 30-day window. It completed 93.6% of 97,139 probes in the last 30 days. Median response time sits at 637ms. At $0.3/GB it is the budget pick in the table, and the score shows that cheap does not mean weak here.

2. Aceproxies

Aceproxies holds second place with a composite score of 79/100 over the rolling 30-day window. It completed 82.9% of 92,246 probes in the last 30 days. Median response time sits at 579ms. Pricing of $6/GB puts it mid-range for residential traffic.

3. GonzoProxy

GonzoProxy holds third place with a composite score of 67/100 over the rolling 30-day window. It completed 78.7% of 98,325 probes in the last 30 days. Median response time sits at 583ms. At $6.5/GB it sits in the premium tier, so weigh the score against the spend.

Three pitfalls that ruin a good pick

Frequently asked questions

What is the best residential proxy right now?

The current leader on our live benchmark holds the top composite score across session reliability, success rate, latency and target reachability. Rankings update as probes run every 15 minutes, so check the comparison table above or the live dashboard for the score as of today rather than trusting a static list.

What is the best residential proxy for web scraping?

For stateless scraping, weight success rate and latency most heavily. For scraping behind logins or session cookies, sticky session survival is the deciding metric: across the providers we test it ranges from 97.5% down to 72.2%, a gap that decides whether multi-step jobs complete. Our per-use-case pages rank providers with weights tuned for each workload.

What is the best cheap residential proxy?

In our benchmark the cheapest provider at $0.30/GB currently scores highest overall, so price and quality are not the trade-off most lists assume. Compare cost per usable gigabyte: a $6/GB provider that breaks one session in four costs more in failed jobs than its sticker price suggests.

What is the best residential proxy for sticky sessions?

The provider with the highest sticky session survival rate and the lowest unexpected mid-session rotation. We measure both continuously: a sticky session that silently rotates your IP breaks logins, carts and checkouts. Pick the provider that holds one IP for the whole session window, and set the session TTL longer than your longest workflow.

Are these rankings affected by affiliate commissions?

No. Scores come from automated probes run on identical schedules against every provider, and the scoring formula is published with a changelog on the methodology page. No provider pays for placement, and ranking position never depends on any commercial relationship.

How often is this comparison updated?

Probes run every 15 minutes from two vantage points (EU and US), composite scores recompute daily over a rolling 30-day window, and this page renders from that live data on every visit. The numbers you see reflect current measured performance, not a review written months ago.

See the numbers behind every claim on this page

Latency trends, success rates, score history and per-dimension breakdowns, updated every 15 minutes.

Open the live benchmark →

ProxyStats is an independent benchmark. We currently run no affiliate links; if that changes, commercial relationships will be disclosed here and will never affect ranking. Methodology, limitations and the scoring changelog: proxystats.io/methodology.